Suggested searches

Navigating the opportunities and risks of patenting AI-designed drugs

Published
19 September 2024
Please subscribe to get latest updates
Vestibulum quam mauris, pulvinar non orci.
Authors
Danny Gelman

Danny Gelman

Associate Principal, Melbourne | BSc (Hons), PhD, MIP Law
Harriet Manley

Harriet Keenan

Associate, Melbourne | BSc Adv (Hons), PhD, MIP Law
Julie Murison

Julie Murison

Associate, Melbourne | BS (Hons), PhD, MIP Law
Share

The rapid development of AI in the field of drug discovery and design is creating exciting new opportunities. In recent years, drugs discovered using AI tools have progressed through early-stage clinical trials, showing promising results. Additionally, the AI toolkit for drug discovery continues to expand, such as the release of AlphaFold3 for protein structure prediction.

However, the use of these AI tools also raises questions about the potential impact on the intellectual property (IP) landscape around new drugs.

In this article series, “Navigating the opportunities and risks of patenting AI-designed drugs”, we discuss some of the most exciting promises that inventors and patentees can access, and also explore the possible challenges and risks that may be faced when seeking patent protection of drugs discovered through the use of AI-tools.

Part 1: Introduction

The rapid pace of AI developments in the field of drug discovery and design is creating exciting new opportunities for inventors.

In recent years, drugs discovered using AI tools have entered and progressed through Phase I and II clinical trials, with initial analyses suggesting reasonable success1,2. Along with these promising clinical developments, the AI drug-discovery toolkit continues to grow – for example, the recent release of AlphaFold3 for protein structure prediction.

But how will these increasingly powerful AI tools impact the IP landscape around new drugs? Will the increasing use of AI in drug design help or hinder those attempting to obtain patent protection for novel molecules?

In Part 1 of this article series, we discuss some of the ways AI tools are being used in drug discovery. In Part 2, we outline some potential benefits and considerations for drug originators when seeking patent protection for pharmaceutical inventions discovered and developed using AI. And in Part 3, we discuss potential risks for patent protection for drugs that have been discovered/designed either wholly or in part through the use of AI tools.

AI tools for drug discovery

AI tools for drug-discovery promise to deliver accessible and cost-effective exploration of therapeutic targets. Drug discovery is an infamously expensive exercise and the ability to quickly explore and optimize potential targets is an exciting prospect for many drug-hunters. It is no surprise that some of the earliest examples of applied AI tools have been in the drug discovery arena – with the goal of reducing the number of Design-Make-Test-Analyse (DMTA) cycles before reaching a promising candidate.

In the table below, we summarise a selection of some of the elements of drug design where there are currently available AI tools that have been built to meet these real-world challenges.

Table 1: Examples of AI tools to assist early-stage drug design

AI-assisted drug design element Examples
identify molecular targets (including epitopes for antibodies, substrates for enzymes, ligands for receptors) Alphafold3, 4 is a tool that can predict the tertiary structure of a protein from the protein sequence. The large advance of Alphafold over previous structure prediction tools is improvement in accuracy of predictions because it uses deep learning methods and large training data sets. Having a reliable model for the 3D-structure of a protein allows researchers to understand the structure of binding sites (including cyptic active sites), to then design molecules capable of binding proteins (in other words, an AI-expedited version of other data-driven drug discovery methods eg brute force docking screens).
predict molecular structures or sequences, fast follower and backup analogue identification Peptilogics5 is a generative AI that can generate peptide sequences that are predicted to bind to a selection of arbitrary proteins based on the protein’s primary sequence. Consequently, if the protein is a drug target, Peptilogics can identify potential peptide therapeutics for targeting that protein.

Similarly, BioNemo6 promises to generate structures of small molecules, which are predicted to bind to certain target proteins (again based on each target protein’s primary sequence).

REINVENT 47 is a generative AI tool for de novo design of small molecules, coming from AstraZeneca.
predict binding specificity, selectivity, strength AlphaFill8 , which transplants small-molecule ligands from experimentally-solved structures to predicted protein models, to visualise the expected binding of the ligands to the protein.

Structure Prediction & Target Enablement9 from Schrödinger, which predicts the binding mode of novel ligands in existing structures, including Alphafold structures. Screening AI programs, such as those available from Schrödinger, can predict ligand binding and placement within a binding site, and strength of docking with free energy predictions.
assess molecular stability and pharmacokinetics 11,12 pkCSM10 is a tool for predicting small-molecule pharmacokinetic properties using graph-based signatures.

There are a host of other AI tools for predicting various aspects of a candidates PK, including:

AI tools for mature drug candidates

We are aware that AI has also been applied to later stages of the drug development process, including clinical trial design15, selecting patient cohorts16 and drug repurposing programs17. Clinical trials are fertile ground for further inventions, which can be extremely valuable to create extended patent term for drugs. While this article focusses on patent implications arising from the use of AI tools in early drug design, similar considerations may arise from the use of AI tools in later stage drug development.

In this article, we have also limited our consideration to how AI tools may assist during the drug design process, as opposed to inventions which are in part an AI, such as AI-assisted diagnostic or therapeutic methods. While some of the same considerations may apply, inventions which are themselves, or include, an AI element are subject to a further set of legal considerations.

Outlook for patenting AI-developed drugs

Based on current trends, it appears that the use and impact of AI in drug design will continue to grow and improve. Due to the centrality of patent protection to successful commercialisation of new drugs, it is important that inventors and would-be patent applicants are aware of how AI tools may aid or hinder a drug’s patent potential.

About the Authors

Danny Gelman

Associate Principal, Melbourne | BSc (Hons), PhD, MIP Law

Danny’s focus: chemistry, pharmaceutical, veterinary and agrochemical.

Learn more about Danny
About the Authors

Harriet Keenan

Associate, Melbourne | BSc Adv (Hons), PhD, MIP Law

Harriet’s focus: immunology, molecular genetics, diagnostics, therapeutic delivery systems, microbiology, haematology, regenerative medicine and cellular agriculture.

Learn more about Harriet
About the Authors

Julie Murison

Associate, Melbourne | BS (Hons), PhD, MIP Law

Julie’s focus: agrochemistry, petrochemistry, materials chemistry and industrial chemistry.

Learn more about Julie
Scroll to Top

Suggested searches

Skip to content